← All summaries

Is a Market Melt-Up Coming? Why Tech & Semis Are Dominating Again

The Real Eisman Playbook · Steve Eisman — Chris Verrone, Todd Sohn · May 4, 2026 · Original

Most important take away

Strategas’s Chris Verrone gives “razor odds of some type of meltup” coming over the next several months — the post-war rally has snapped right back to the same leadership (semis, AI-adjacent power industrials, banks) with no real regime change despite March’s 7% Nasdaq drawdown. Semis are now 17% of the S&P (vs. 2% a decade ago) — actionable: investors should diversify because passive S&P exposure is now extremely concentrated in a handful of memory/AI-adjacent names.

Summary

Stocks/sectors mentioned and the actionable view on each:

Bullish / leadership (still working):

  • Semis (17% of S&P, ~50% of info tech). Memory stocks, semi-cap equipment continuing 2025 leadership. Names: Nvidia (NVDA), Broadcom (AVGO), Micron (MU — now larger than J&J), AMD (creeping into top 15 of S&P).
  • Power / AI-adjacent industrials. GE Vernova (GEV — now larger than GE Aerospace; one of only three global gas-turbine makers along with Siemens Energy and Mitsubishi). Vertiv (VRT), Eaton (ETN), Quanta (PWR).
  • Transports — making new all-time highs: trucks, rails (CSX, J.B. Hunt). Hard to make recession your base case when transports break out. Reminded host of summer-2008 transports head-fake but he sees this as different.
  • Energy — turned up last September (not because of the war). Now reasonably oversold in a good long-term uptrend; Verrone is increasing energy exposure, not cutting.
  • Banks — Citigroup (C) is the canary; Jane Fraser has done a “tremendous job” — ROE >10%. Charts fine. BAC middle of pack. Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) — good numbers, decent action.

Mixed / dispersing:

  • Software (now 7-8% of S&P, down from teens 2 years ago). “Generational oversold” but not actionable yet. ServiceNow (NOW) printed +22% revenue growth and beat — stock down 14%. “Things don’t bottom on good news; they bottom on bad news.” Wait for the first names to differentiate from the pack. Adobe (ADBE) sitting on its 40-year trend line. Software won’t bottom until semis crack — and there’s no evidence of that yet. Hedge funds increasingly using software as a relative short basket.
  • Payments as relative shorts — Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), AmEx (AXP) all making relative new lows; AXP’s “tremendous” numbers couldn’t lift the stock. Tech-PMs forced to hunt shorts here since they can’t short software.
  • Wells Fargo (WFC) — culture of “screwing up a quarter every 4-5 quarters.” Net interest margin down 13bps sequentially. Disperse from the rest of the bank trade.
  • Private credit / Apollo (APO) — Apollo acts better here; uniquely has least exposure to software (~5%). Other PE companies have heavy software exposure and that’s the risk. No evidence of credit deterioration in big-bank loan books yet, but software companies cut in half is a real problem to watch.

Underwhelming / out of leadership:

  • Gold — “Jumped the shark” from safe-haven to risk asset in Oct/Nov 2025. Behaved like a semiconductor stock, correlated to NASDAQ. Mental-mania January (>$100B in gold/precious-metal ETFs in a single day). Gold fell during the war despite inflation/oil spike — the long-term bull may still be on but something has changed; be open to it. Industrial metals (copper, aluminum) acting better.
  • Healthcare — under-whelming relative to expectations. JNJ, Thermo, Intuitive Surgical not bad but not leadership. Big pharma weak. Medical insurers (UnitedHealth-type names) bouncing off long downtrends.
  • Consumer staples — outperformed two weeks then gave it back. No defensive bid taking the leadership reins.
  • Defense contractors — surprisingly bad given macro setup. European defense (Rheinmetall RHM, BAE Systems) breaking down. Possibly because rising German Bund yields crowd out public defense spending. Deluge of defense ETFs is a top-signal.
  • Insurers (separate from defense) — defensive cohort that has struggled.
  • Capital markets / asset managers — WisdomTree (WT), State Street (STT), Bank of NY Mellon (BK), Invesco (IVZ) under some pressure from competitive QQQ-rival products.

Actionable insights:

  1. Most important call: diversify away from passive concentration. With semis at 17% of S&P, owning the index = owning a memory/AI bet. Verrone explicitly recommends diversifying into energy, materials, natural resources, alternatives. “You probably have more than you think of those companies.”

  2. A “melt-up” feel is here. Velocity of the recovery off March 31 lows resembles coming out of LTCM. Narrowly focused leadership is reminiscent of 1999 — but unlike 1999 (when all tech sub-sectors worked simultaneously), today is highly rotational (24 was hyperscalers, 25 is memory, semi-cap equipment now leading at expense of software). High-profile IPOs incoming (SpaceX, possibly Anthropic, OpenAI) often symbolically precede meltup peaks (the Blackstone-IPO meltup of summer 2007 is the warning).

  3. Don’t fight the leadership. “It is the same story” — AI/tech/power/banks. The drawdown wasn’t deep enough (~8-9%) to be a regime-change event.

  4. Software is generational-oversold but not yet actionable. Wait for first names to differentiate. Adobe at 40-year trend line is interesting. Don’t short it — too dangerous. Consider tight-stop options exposure if you must dabble. Tell-tale sign of bottom: “tech-ex-software” ETFs launching (like the old QQQ-ex-Apple template).

  5. Watch for credit-event vs. geopolitical-event distinction. Wars rarely cause durable market damage; financial events do. Test: is private-credit weakness permeating banks? Currently no — Eisman went over big-bank credit data with a fine-tooth comb and saw no consumer or commercial deterioration. But software cut-in-half is the real risk vector.

  6. Behavioral data signals embrace, not skepticism. Equity ETF inflows ran ~$3B/day in March; doubled to ~$7B/day in April (mostly tech). This is not the cautious recovery of mid-2024 — investors are aggressive again.

  7. Specific stock to look at: GE Vernova (GEV) — host owns it, called it one of the craziest stocks he’s seen. The thesis: only three companies on Earth make gas turbines (GEV, Mitsubishi, Siemens Energy). Same chart, same trajectory. Siemens Energy is approaching the size of Siemens itself.

Investment advice — what to do:

  • Trim concentration risk: most investors are over-exposed to semis/AI passively via the S&P.
  • Add to energy on weakness; the fundamental setup is intact.
  • Be cautious on geopolitical-driven defense narratives — the price action says the trade is tired.
  • Don’t chase the meltup, but don’t fight it either. Diversify into energy, materials, natural resources, alternatives.
  • Wait for software signal: differentiation among names + first “tech-ex-software” ETF launches.

Chapter Summaries

  1. Setup: a year-over-year déjà vu — Last year’s Feb-Apr swoon and rally pattern played out almost identically in 2026 (war-driven swoon March, full recovery + new highs by late April).

  2. Why the recovery happened so fast — Drawdown wasn’t deep enough (~8-9%) to be a regime change. Embrace was much quicker than 2024 — equity ETF inflows doubled to ~$7B/day in April vs. $3B/day in March.

  3. Gold as the surprise — Acted like a semiconductor stock, not a safe haven. January was “mental mania” with $100B+ in single-day ETF volume. Gold sold off through the war. The story has changed — be open to it. Industrial metals (copper, aluminum) acting better.

  4. Tech is no longer monolithic — Semis at 17% of S&P (50% of info tech). Software at 7-8%, down from teens. Software is generational-oversold but not actionable until semis crack.

  5. Software dynamics in detail — ServiceNow’s 22% beat got a 14% drawdown. Tops happen on good news; bottoms happen on bad news. Adobe at 40-year trend line. Hedge fund clients now using software as a relative-short basket.

  6. Payments emerging as relative shorts — V, MA, AXP making relative new lows; AmEx’s tremendous Q couldn’t lift the stock.

  7. Financials & private credit — Citi as canary; Jane Fraser executing well. No credit deterioration in big-bank books. Apollo (APO) acts better — least software exposure (~5%) of the PE complex.

  8. Wars vs. financial events — Geopolitical events rarely have durable market impact (WWII peaked after the war; Iraq 2003 was a low). Financial events do. Watch private-credit-to-bank contagion.

  9. What’s not working — Healthcare under-whelming; consumer staples can’t take leadership; insurers struggling; defense contractors (especially European RHM, BAE) breaking down despite the macro setup.

  10. Industrials & the GE Vernova story — Power/AI-adjacent industrials leading. Only three global gas-turbine makers. Transports breaking out — hard to make recession your base case.

  11. Energy — Turned up September 2025; not war-driven. Now oversold in a good uptrend; Verrone increasing exposure.

  12. Final message: razor-odds of a melt-up; diversify — IPO calendar (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI) symbolically precedes meltup tops. Diversify away from semi-concentration into energy, materials, natural resources, alternatives.